Necessity knows no law

Necessity knows no law

Desperation will drive those in need to disobey the law to obtain what they require. I had a pretty hardline on crime until I lost my job, became homeless, and had to resort to stealing to avoid starving to death. Since then, I've come to realize that necessity knows no law.
See also: know, law, necessity, no
Farlex Dictionary of Idioms.

Necessity knows no law.

Prov. If you are desperate, you may have to do illegal things. I'm an honest person by nature, but I lost my job, and my kids needed food and clothes, and it seemed like the best way to get money was to deal in illegal drugs. Necessity knows no law.
See also: know, law, necessity, no
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs.
See also:
  • Needs must when the devil drives
  • dust (one's) pants
  • dust pants
  • dust someone’s pants
  • hot under the collar
  • hot under the collar, to be
  • get (something) for (someone or something)
  • Hail Mary
  • Hail Mary pass
  • Hail Mary play
References in periodicals archive
Necessity knows no law. This proverb encapsulates the fundamental tension between legal frameworks that seek to normalize social behaviour and urgent action in response to unpredictable events.
Eco-terrorists facing Armageddon: the defence of necessity and legal normativity in the context of environmental crisis
Necessity knows no law, it is said; and indeed to invoke necessity is to step outside the law.
[International law] rejects the idea that necessity knows no law.
In the context of the British intervention in Egypt in 1956 in connection with the Suez Crisis, the then legal advisor to the British Foreign Office and member of the ILC, later Judge at the ICJ, Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice described the doctrine of so-called necessity as a "rather back-handed doctrine, since it is founded on the maxim that necessity knows no law, but one to which international law does, nevertheless, within pretty stringent limits, afford recognition." (50) States have, in their responses to the ILC, exhibited some ambivalence toward the concept of a state of necessity.
Today, after the work of the ILC and the endorsement of the ICJ, it is fair to echo Schachter's observation that international law rejects the idea that necessity knows no law. Decades of study have found that necessity exists in international law and that the best safeguard against abuse of the concept is its codification in the Draft Articles on State Responsibility with appropriate, strictly defined, and cumulative circumscriptions.
Also see the editorial comment in the American Journal of International Law: "It therefore appears that the Chancellor knew and admitted that the occupation of Belgium and Luxemburg was contrary to international law, but he justified the act by the statement that the German Empire was 'in a state of necessity' and that 'necessity knows no law.'" Editorial Comment, 8 AM.
The use of force and (the state of) necessity